January 12, 2017

トランプ会見

トランプ次期大統領初会見です。CNNの質問に「偽ニュース流すから答えない!」と、子供な対応をしています。さすがだw

そのCNNさんからのフル動画です。英語が分かる方はどうぞ!(私はわからん)



記者会見要旨は時事さんから。

時事 トランプ次期米大統領の記者会見要旨
http://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2017011200152


ロシアが大統領選を支援したことを認めたり、ロシアに弱みを握られていると報告されたり(なんとハニートラップという噂がw)、手当たり次第、海外投資する企業を罵ったり・・・。大丈夫かなあ。不安。

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

真珠湾訪問

オバマのさよなら演説をアップしたので、昨年末の安倍首相真珠湾訪問時の演説を掲載しておきます。





オバマ政権の最初のうちは、日本の政権が安定しなかったこともあって、ぎくしゃくした日米関係ですが、2012年に第二次安倍政権が発足してからは安定し、安倍首相の米議会演説、オバマ広島訪問、安倍首相真珠湾訪問という成果を得られました。オバマとしても、この真珠湾訪問が有終の美になったというか、退任の花道になったのではないでしょうか。もちろん私ごときが評価するような話ではありませんが。

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

さよならオバマ 最後の演説

1月10日、オバマ大統領が、最後の演説、フェアウェル演説をシカゴで行いました。まるで大統領選のように、大衆を前に、大統領がさよなら演説をするのは初めてのことだそうです。

演説中、オバマが感極まって涙ぐんだシーンがありました。聴衆には泣いている人がいたり、「あと4年やって!」と声がかかったりと、好かれているんですね、オバマ。2016年の大統領選にオバマが立候補していればトランプに勝てていただろうと、オバマ自身が言ったということですが、実際そうかもしれません。

オバマウォッチャーとして、オバマ大統領の8年間を振り返れば、正直、外交的には全然ダメだったと思うわけです。一方で内政的には、景気も良くなっているし、トランプがやめると言っているオバマケアで命を救われた人も多いと思います。先日、うっかり継続していたAmazonアンリミテッドが悔しくて読んだWiredでも、AI等の最新技術について、大変深い考察をしていました。思慮深い人なんですね。思慮深く、内政に目を配って、国民に犠牲が出ないようにした、ということでしょう。

さて、オバマに対する否定的評価の原因となっている外交ですが、シリア攻撃を直前に撤回しシリア情勢を悪化させた張本人ですし、中国の南沙諸島埋め立てを放置していたり、その他いろいろあって、私から見ても弱腰すぎと言わざるをえません。

しかし、先日「あの国で、持てる武力を使わないというのも大変なんじゃないか?」という指摘を受け、ハッとしました。そうだろうなあ。あのマッチョな国で武力を使わないなんて。Netflix『サバイバー 宿命の大統領』でも、あのジャックが(違w)武力行使に及び腰な姿勢をみせていまして、その意を強くしました。ある場面では、非情でないと大統領なんて務まらない。その意味でオバマには大統領は向いていなかったんでしょう。ただし2008年のあの時、アメリカ人はそれをわかっていてオバマを選んだので、なるべくしてそうなったともいえます。ただし、それはトランプにも言えることなので、これからかなり恐ろしいですね。(それにしてもトランプの会見ひどいな)

では、オバマ大統領、最後のスピーチです。

さよならオバマ。広島に来てくれて、ありがとう。

ホワイトハウスのHPより全文(英語)です。このページ、トランプになったら残るのかしら?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/farewell

日本語訳を見つけました。こちらを御覧ください。
http://logmi.jp/180020

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Chicago! (Applause.) It's good to be home! (Applause.) Thank you, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you so much. Thank you. (Applause.) All right, everybody sit down. (Applause.) We're on live TV here. I've got to move. (Applause.) You can tell that I'm a lame duck because nobody is following instructions. (Laughter.) Everybody have a seat. (Applause.)

My fellow Americans — (applause) — Michelle and I have been so touched by all the well wishes that we've received over the past few weeks. But tonight, it's my turn to say thanks. (Applause.) Whether we have seen eye-to-eye or rarely agreed at all, my conversations with you, the American people, in living rooms and in schools, at farms, on factory floors, at diners and on distant military outposts — those conversations are what have kept me honest, and kept me inspired, and kept me going. And every day, I have learned from you. You made me a better President, and you made me a better man. (Applause.)

So I first came to Chicago when I was in my early 20s. And I was still trying to figure out who I was, still searching for a purpose in my life. And it was a neighborhood not far from here where I began working with church groups in the shadows of closed steel mills. It was on these streets where I witnessed the power of faith, and the quiet dignity of working people in the face of struggle and loss.

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: I can't do that.

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: This is where I learned that change only happens when ordinary people get involved and they get engaged, and they come together to demand it.

After eight years as your President, I still believe that. And it's not just my belief. It's the beating heart of our American idea — our bold experiment in self-government. It's the conviction that we are all created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It's the insistence that these rights, while self-evident, have never been self-executing; that We, the People, through the instrument of our democracy, can form a more perfect union.

What a radical idea. A great gift that our Founders gave to us: The freedom to chase our individual dreams through our sweat and toil and imagination, and the imperative to strive together, as well, to achieve a common good, a greater good.

For 240 years, our nation's call to citizenship has given work and purpose to each new generation. It's what led patriots to choose republic over tyranny, pioneers to trek west, slaves to brave that makeshift railroad to freedom. It's what pulled immigrants and refugees across oceans and the Rio Grande. (Applause.) It's what pushed women to reach for the ballot. It's what powered workers to organize. It's why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima, Iraq and Afghanistan. And why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were prepared to give theirs, as well. (Applause.)

So that's what we mean when we say America is exceptional — not that our nation has been flawless from the start, but that we have shown the capacity to change and make life better for those who follow. Yes, our progress has been uneven. The work of democracy has always been hard. It's always been contentious. Sometimes it's been bloody. For every two steps forward, it often feels we take one step back. But the long sweep of America has been defined by forward motion, a constant widening of our founding creed to embrace all and not just some. (Applause.)

If I had told you eight years ago that America would reverse a great recession, reboot our auto industry, and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in our history — (applause) — if I had told you that we would open up a new chapter with the Cuban people, shut down Iran's nuclear weapons program without firing a shot, take out the mastermind of 9/11 — (applause) — if I had told you that we would win marriage equality, and secure the right to health insurance for another 20 million of our fellow citizens — (applause) — if I had told you all that, you might have said our sights were set a little too high. But that's what we did. (Applause.) That's what you did.

You were the change. You answered people's hopes, and because of you, by almost every measure, America is a better, stronger place than it was when we started. (Applause.)

In 10 days, the world will witness a hallmark of our democracy.

AUDIENCE: Nooo —

THE PRESIDENT: No, no, no, no, no — the peaceful transfer of power from one freely elected President to the next. (Applause.) I committed to President-elect Trump that my administration would ensure the smoothest possible transition, just as President Bush did for me. (Applause.) Because it's up to all of us to make sure our government can help us meet the many challenges we still face.

We have what we need to do so. We have everything we need to meet those challenges. After all, we remain the wealthiest, most powerful, and most respected nation on Earth. Our youth, our drive, our diversity and openness, our boundless capacity for risk and reinvention means that the future should be ours. But that potential will only be realized if our democracy works. Only if our politics better reflects the decency of our people. (Applause.) Only if all of us, regardless of party affiliation or particular interests, help restore the sense of common purpose that we so badly need right now.

That's what I want to focus on tonight: The state of our democracy. Understand, democracy does not require uniformity. Our founders argued. They quarreled. Eventually they compromised. They expected us to do the same. But they knew that democracy does require a basic sense of solidarity — the idea that for all our outward differences, we're all in this together; that we rise or fall as one. (Applause.)

There have been moments throughout our history that threatens that solidarity. And the beginning of this century has been one of those times. A shrinking world, growing inequality; demographic change and the specter of terrorism — these forces haven't just tested our security and our prosperity, but are testing our democracy, as well. And how we meet these challenges to our democracy will determine our ability to educate our kids, and create good jobs, and protect our homeland. In other words, it will determine our future.

To begin with, our democracy won't work without a sense that everyone has economic opportunity. And the good news is that today the economy is growing again. Wages, incomes, home values, and retirement accounts are all rising again. Poverty is falling again. (Applause.) The wealthy are paying a fairer share of taxes even as the stock market shatters records. The unemployment rate is near a 10-year low. The uninsured rate has never, ever been lower. (Applause.) Health care costs are rising at the slowest rate in 50 years. And I've said and I mean it — if anyone can put together a plan that is demonstrably better than the improvements we've made to our health care system and that covers as many people at less cost, I will publicly support it. (Applause.)

Because that, after all, is why we serve. Not to score points or take credit, but to make people's lives better. (Applause.)

But for all the real progress that we've made, we know it's not enough. Our economy doesn't work as well or grow as fast when a few prosper at the expense of a growing middle class and ladders for folks who want to get into the middle class. (Applause.) That's the economic argument. But stark inequality is also corrosive to our democratic ideal. While the top one percent has amassed a bigger share of wealth and income, too many families, in inner cities and in rural counties, have been left behind — the laid-off factory worker; the waitress or health care worker who's just barely getting by and struggling to pay the bills — convinced that the game is fixed against them, that their government only serves the interests of the powerful — that's a recipe for more cynicism and polarization in our politics.

But there are no quick fixes to this long-term trend. I agree, our trade should be fair and not just free. But the next wave of economic dislocations won't come from overseas. It will come from the relentless pace of automation that makes a lot of good, middle-class jobs obsolete.

And so we're going to have to forge a new social compact to guarantee all our kids the education they need — (applause) — to give workers the power to unionize for better wages; to update the social safety net to reflect the way we live now, and make more reforms to the tax code so corporations and individuals who reap the most from this new economy don't avoid their obligations to the country that's made their very success possible. (Applause.)

We can argue about how to best achieve these goals. But we can't be complacent about the goals themselves. For if we don't create opportunity for all people, the disaffection and division that has stalled our progress will only sharpen in years to come.

There's a second threat to our democracy — and this one is as old as our nation itself. After my election, there was talk of a post-racial America. And such a vision, however well-intended, was never realistic. Race remains a potent and often divisive force in our society. Now, I've lived long enough to know that race relations are better than they were 10, or 20, or 30 years ago, no matter what some folks say. (Applause.) You can see it not just in statistics, you see it in the attitudes of young Americans across the political spectrum.

But we're not where we need to be. And all of us have more work to do. (Applause.) If every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hardworking white middle class and an undeserving minority, then workers of all shades are going to be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves. (Applause.) If we're unwilling to invest in the children of immigrants, just because they don't look like us, we will diminish the prospects of our own children — because those brown kids will represent a larger and larger share of America's workforce. (Applause.) And we have shown that our economy doesn't have to be a zero-sum game. Last year, incomes rose for all races, all age groups, for men and for women.

So if we're going to be serious about race going forward, we need to uphold laws against discrimination — in hiring, and in housing, and in education, and in the criminal justice system. (Applause.) That is what our Constitution and our highest ideals require. (Applause.)

But laws alone won't be enough. Hearts must change. It won't change overnight. Social attitudes oftentimes take generations to change. But if our democracy is to work in this increasingly diverse nation, then each one of us need to try to heed the advice of a great character in American fiction — Atticus Finch — (applause) — who said “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view…until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.”

For blacks and other minority groups, it means tying our own very real struggles for justice to the challenges that a lot of people in this country face — not only the refugee, or the immigrant, or the rural poor, or the transgender American, but also the middle-aged white guy who, from the outside, may seem like he's got advantages, but has seen his world upended by economic and cultural and technological change. We have to pay attention, and listen. (Applause.)

For white Americans, it means acknowledging that the effects of slavery and Jim Crow didn't suddenly vanish in the '60s — (applause) — that when minority groups voice discontent, they're not just engaging in reverse racism or practicing political correctness. When they wage peaceful protest, they're not demanding special treatment but the equal treatment that our Founders promised. (Applause.)

For native-born Americans, it means reminding ourselves that the stereotypes about immigrants today were said, almost word for word, about the Irish, and Italians, and Poles — who it was said we're going to destroy the fundamental character of America. And as it turned out, America wasn't weakened by the presence of these newcomers; these newcomers embraced this nation's creed, and this nation was strengthened. (Applause.)

So regardless of the station that we occupy, we all have to try harder. We all have to start with the premise that each of our fellow citizens loves this country just as much as we do; that they value hard work and family just like we do; that their children are just as curious and hopeful and worthy of love as our own. (Applause.)

And that's not easy to do. For too many of us, it's become safer to retreat into our own bubbles, whether in our neighborhoods or on college campuses, or places of worship, or especially our social media feeds, surrounded by people who look like us and share the same political outlook and never challenge our assumptions. The rise of naked partisanship, and increasing economic and regional stratification, the splintering of our media into a channel for every taste — all this makes this great sorting seem natural, even inevitable. And increasingly, we become so secure in our bubbles that we start accepting only information, whether it's true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that is out there. (Applause.)

And this trend represents a third threat to our democracy. But politics is a battle of ideas. That's how our democracy was designed. In the course of a healthy debate, we prioritize different goals, and the different means of reaching them. But without some common baseline of facts, without a willingness to admit new information, and concede that your opponent might be making a fair point, and that science and reason matter — (applause) — then we're going to keep talking past each other, and we'll make common ground and compromise impossible. (Applause.)

And isn't that part of what so often makes politics dispiriting? How can elected officials rage about deficits when we propose to spend money on preschool for kids, but not when we're cutting taxes for corporations? (Applause.) How do we excuse ethical lapses in our own party, but pounce when the other party does the same thing? It's not just dishonest, this selective sorting of the facts; it's self-defeating. Because, as my mother used to tell me, reality has a way of catching up with you. (Applause.)

Take the challenge of climate change. In just eight years, we've halved our dependence on foreign oil; we've doubled our renewable energy; we've led the world to an agreement that has the promise to save this planet. (Applause.) But without bolder action, our children won't have time to debate the existence of climate change. They'll be busy dealing with its effects: more environmental disasters, more economic disruptions, waves of climate refugees seeking sanctuary.

Now, we can and should argue about the best approach to solve the problem. But to simply deny the problem not only betrays future generations, it betrays the essential spirit of this country — the essential spirit of innovation and practical problem-solving that guided our Founders. (Applause.)

It is that spirit, born of the Enlightenment, that made us an economic powerhouse — the spirit that took flight at Kitty Hawk and Cape Canaveral; the spirit that cures disease and put a computer in every pocket.

It's that spirit — a faith in reason, and enterprise, and the primacy of right over might — that allowed us to resist the lure of fascism and tyranny during the Great Depression; that allowed us to build a post-World War II order with other democracies, an order based not just on military power or national affiliations but built on principles — the rule of law, human rights, freedom of religion, and speech, and assembly, and an independent press. (Applause.)

That order is now being challenged — first by violent fanatics who claim to speak for Islam; more recently by autocrats in foreign capitals who see free markets and open democracies and and civil society itself as a threat to their power. The peril each poses to our democracy is more far-reaching than a car bomb or a missile. It represents the fear of change; the fear of people who look or speak or pray differently; a contempt for the rule of law that holds leaders accountable; an intolerance of dissent and free thought; a belief that the sword or the gun or the bomb or the propaganda machine is the ultimate arbiter of what's true and what's right.

Because of the extraordinary courage of our men and women in uniform, because of our intelligence officers, and law enforcement, and diplomats who support our troops — (applause) — no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland these past eight years. (Applause.) And although Boston and Orlando and San Bernardino and Fort Hood remind us of how dangerous radicalization can be, our law enforcement agencies are more effective and vigilant than ever. We have taken out tens of thousands of terrorists — including bin Laden. (Applause.) The global coalition we're leading against ISIL has taken out their leaders, and taken away about half their territory. ISIL will be destroyed, and no one who threatens America will ever be safe. (Applause.)

And to all who serve or have served, it has been the honor of my lifetime to be your Commander-in-Chief. And we all owe you a deep debt of gratitude. (Applause.)

But protecting our way of life, that's not just the job of our military. Democracy can buckle when we give in to fear. So, just as we, as citizens, must remain vigilant against external aggression, we must guard against a weakening of the values that make us who we are. (Applause.)

And that's why, for the past eight years, I've worked to put the fight against terrorism on a firmer legal footing. That's why we've ended torture, worked to close Gitmo, reformed our laws governing surveillance to protect privacy and civil liberties. (Applause.) That's why I reject discrimination against Muslim Americans, who are just as patriotic as we are. (Applause.)

That's why we cannot withdraw from big global fights — to expand democracy, and human rights, and women's rights, and LGBT rights. No matter how imperfect our efforts, no matter how expedient ignoring such values may seem, that's part of defending America. For the fight against extremism and intolerance and sectarianism and chauvinism are of a piece with the fight against authoritarianism and nationalist aggression. If the scope of freedom and respect for the rule of law shrinks around the world, the likelihood of war within and between nations increases, and our own freedoms will eventually be threatened.

So let's be vigilant, but not afraid. (Applause.) ISIL will try to kill innocent people. But they cannot defeat America unless we betray our Constitution and our principles in the fight. (Applause.) Rivals like Russia or China cannot match our influence around the world — unless we give up what we stand for — (applause) — and turn ourselves into just another big country that bullies smaller neighbors.

Which brings me to my final point: Our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted. (Applause.) All of us, regardless of party, should be throwing ourselves into the task of rebuilding our democratic institutions. (Applause.) When voting rates in America are some of the lowest among advanced democracies, we should be making it easier, not harder, to vote. (Applause.) When trust in our institutions is low, we should reduce the corrosive influence of money in our politics, and insist on the principles of transparency and ethics in public service. (Applause.) When Congress is dysfunctional, we should draw our congressional districts to encourage politicians to cater to common sense and not rigid extremes. (Applause.)

But remember, none of this happens on its own. All of this depends on our participation; on each of us accepting the responsibility of citizenship, regardless of which way the pendulum of power happens to be swinging.

Our Constitution is a remarkable, beautiful gift. But it's really just a piece of parchment. It has no power on its own. We, the people, give it power. (Applause.) We, the people, give it meaning. With our participation, and with the choices that we make, and the alliances that we forge. (Applause.) Whether or not we stand up for our freedoms. Whether or not we respect and enforce the rule of law. That's up to us. America is no fragile thing. But the gains of our long journey to freedom are not assured.

In his own farewell address, George Washington wrote that self-government is the underpinning of our safety, prosperity, and liberty, but “from different causes and from different quarters much pains will be taken…to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.” And so we have to preserve this truth with “jealous anxiety;” that we should reject “the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties” that make us one. (Applause.)

America, we weaken those ties when we allow our political dialogue to become so corrosive that people of good character aren't even willing to enter into public service; so coarse with rancor that Americans with whom we disagree are seen not just as misguided but as malevolent. We weaken those ties when we define some of us as more American than others; when we write off the whole system as inevitably corrupt, and when we sit back and blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them. (Applause.)

It falls to each of us to be those those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy; to embrace the joyous task we've been given to continually try to improve this great nation of ours. Because for all our outward differences, we, in fact, all share the same proud title, the most important office in a democracy: Citizen. (Applause.) Citizen.

So, you see, that's what our democracy demands. It needs you. Not just when there's an election, not just when your own narrow interest is at stake, but over the full span of a lifetime. If you're tired of arguing with strangers on the Internet, try talking with one of them in real life. (Applause.) If something needs fixing, then lace up your shoes and do some organizing. (Applause.) If you're disappointed by your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office yourself. (Applause.) Show up. Dive in. Stay at it.

Sometimes you'll win. Sometimes you'll lose. Presuming a reservoir of goodness in other people, that can be a risk, and there will be times when the process will disappoint you. But for those of us fortunate enough to have been a part of this work, and to see it up close, let me tell you, it can energize and inspire. And more often than not, your faith in America — and in Americans — will be confirmed. (Applause.)

Mine sure has been. Over the course of these eight years, I've seen the hopeful faces of young graduates and our newest military officers. I have mourned with grieving families searching for answers, and found grace in a Charleston church. I've seen our scientists help a paralyzed man regain his sense of touch. I've seen wounded warriors who at points were given up for dead walk again. I've seen our doctors and volunteers rebuild after earthquakes and stop pandemics in their tracks. I've seen the youngest of children remind us through their actions and through their generosity of our obligations to care for refugees, or work for peace, and, above all, to look out for each other. (Applause.)

So that faith that I placed all those years ago, not far from here, in the power of ordinary Americans to bring about change — that faith has been rewarded in ways I could not have possibly imagined. And I hope your faith has, too. Some of you here tonight or watching at home, you were there with us in 2004, in 2008, 2012 — (applause) — maybe you still can't believe we pulled this whole thing off. Let me tell you, you're not the only ones. (Laughter.)

Michelle — (applause) — Michelle LaVaughn Robinson, girl of the South Side — (applause) — for the past 25 years, you have not only been my wife and mother of my children, you have been my best friend. (Applause.) You took on a role you didn't ask for and you made it your own, with grace and with grit and with style and good humor. (Applause.) You made the White House a place that belongs to everybody. (Applause.) And the new generation sets its sights higher because it has you as a role model. (Applause.) So you have made me proud. And you have made the country proud. (Applause.)

Malia and Sasha, under the strangest of circumstances, you have become two amazing young women. You are smart and you are beautiful, but more importantly, you are kind and you are thoughtful and you are full of passion. (Applause.) You wore the burden of years in the spotlight so easily. Of all that I've done in my life, I am most proud to be your dad. (Applause.)

To Joe Biden — (applause) — the scrappy kid from Scranton who became Delaware's favorite son — you were the first decision I made as a nominee, and it was the best. (Applause.) Not just because you have been a great Vice President, but because in the bargain, I gained a brother. And we love you and Jill like family, and your friendship has been one of the great joys of our lives. (Applause.)

To my remarkable staff: For eight years — and for some of you, a whole lot more — I have drawn from your energy, and every day I tried to reflect back what you displayed — heart, and character, and idealism. I've watched you grow up, get married, have kids, start incredible new journeys of your own. Even when times got tough and frustrating, you never let Washington get the better of you. You guarded against cynicism. And the only thing that makes me prouder than all the good that we've done is the thought of all the amazing things that you're going to achieve from here. (Applause.)

And to all of you out there — every organizer who moved to an unfamiliar town, every kind family who welcomed them in, every volunteer who knocked on doors, every young person who cast a ballot for the first time, every American who lived and breathed the hard work of change — you are the best supporters and organizers anybody could ever hope for, and I will be forever grateful. (Applause.) Because you did change the world. (Applause.) You did.

And that's why I leave this stage tonight even more optimistic about this country than when we started. Because I know our work has not only helped so many Americans, it has inspired so many Americans — especially so many young people out there — to believe that you can make a difference — (applause) — to hitch your wagon to something bigger than yourselves.

Let me tell you, this generation coming up — unselfish, altruistic, creative, patriotic — I've seen you in every corner of the country. You believe in a fair, and just, and inclusive America. (Applause.) You know that constant change has been America's hallmark; that it's not something to fear but something to embrace. You are willing to carry this hard work of democracy forward. You'll soon outnumber all of us, and I believe as a result the future is in good hands. (Applause.)

My fellow Americans, it has been the honor of my life to serve you. (Applause.) I won't stop. In fact, I will be right there with you, as a citizen, for all my remaining days. But for now, whether you are young or whether you're young at heart, I do have one final ask of you as your President — the same thing I asked when you took a chance on me eight years ago. I'm asking you to believe. Not in my ability to bring about change — but in yours.

I am asking you to hold fast to that faith written into our founding documents; that idea whispered by slaves and abolitionists; that spirit sung by immigrants and homesteaders and those who marched for justice; that creed reaffirmed by those who planted flags from foreign battlefields to the surface of the moon; a creed at the core of every American whose story is not yet written: Yes, we can. (Applause.)

Yes, we did. Yes, we can. (Applause.)

Thank you. God bless you. May God continue to bless the United States of America. (Applause.)



おまけ
NW オバマ米大統領の退任演説は「異例」だった
http://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2017/01/post-6700.php

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

November 13, 2016

ヒラリーの敗因の一つ、メール問題について

2回目の大統領への挑戦で、またも敗れたヒラリー・ロダム・クリントン。

【米大統領選2016】本当のヒラリー・クリントンとは  レンズの中の人生

トランプは選挙戦の中ではありますが「30年間の政治生活で何もできなかった」といい、「既得権益側の金に汚い政治家」「嘘つき」だとレッテル付けしていました。果たしてそうなんでしょうか?
 
ヒラリーに詳しいわけではないので、相当調べる必要がありそうです。中途半端になりそうなので、ここではやめておきますが、まあ、お金に汚いという点はいなめないですね。中国からもお金をもらっていたし、以前にはトランプからももらっていたようです。クリントン財団がISに資金を流していたのではという疑惑もありますね。

でも、今回の選挙戦で一番の争点になったのは、メール問題でした。ずうっと問題になっていたのですが、FBIが訴追しないことを決定し、解決したかのように見えていました。しかし、投票日11日前に、コミーFBI長官が、新たなメールが見つかったと発表。ヒラリーの支持率は落ちていきました。

でも、この発表、問題のあるメールが見つかったのではなく、新しいメールが見つかったというだけでした。そして2日前に、訴追しないことを表明しました。前に見つかったメールと同じだったと…。なんだそれ。結果的にイメージ操作に繋がったわけです。

NW メール問題、FBIはクリントンの足を引っ張ったのか?

そもそも、ヒラリーのメール問題ですが、司法長官時代に私的なメールアカウントを使っていたという話です。では私的メールアカウントを使うことが問題かというと、そうでもないようです。

WSJヒラリー・クリントン氏の電子メール問題、知っておくべき5項目

私的な電子メールアカウント使用は初めてではない

 クリントン氏の大統領選出馬を支持する人々で構成される調査組織「Correct The Record」は、同氏が国務省提供の電子メールアカウントではなく、私的なアカウントを使用していたことを認めた。

 同組織は、国務省の公式電子メールを「主に」使用しているのは現職のジョン・ケリー国務長官が初めてで、コリン・パウエル元国務長官(在任期間01-05年)も私的なアカウントを使用していたと指摘している。

米高官の電子メール使用に関する規定はあいまい

 国務省は2日夜、米国国立公文書館(NARA)が13年に出した指針に沿った公文書保存方針を採用するために取り組んでいると明らかにした。
 同指針では、公務員は一般的に、公務を行う上で私的な電子メールアカウントを使用すべきではないとしている。クリントン氏はNARAがこうした指針を公表する前に国務長官を退任していた。


にもかかわらず、投票日直前にFBIが再捜査を発表し、2日前になんでもなかったという…なにこれっていう、オクトーバーサプライズ。何か、執拗ないやらしさを感じるのは私だけでしょうか。

この執拗さは既視感があります。何かというと、ビル・クリントン大統領時代末期の、モニカ・ルインスキー事件です。ビルが女たらしなのはみな知っていたことでしょうし、それだけの魅力がある男性だったのでしょう。以前お世話になった通訳さんは、ホワイトハウスに入ったことがあって、その時、ヒラリーではなく、ビルが中を案内してくれたそうです。「ビルは素敵でぽおっとなるような感じ」と言ってましたよ(ヒラリーは冷たい感じだったってw)。

それに、モニカ事件は合意の上でいろいろあったというだけの話です。そんな下世話な話を延々と、本当に延々と追及していたのは、スター特別検察官。モニカの洋服についた体液のDNA鑑定までしたんです。あの追及について、執拗過ぎると思っていたのは私だけではないはず。

このスター特別検察官、ブッシュ父政権の司法次官補で、特別検察官当時、タバコ会社のロビー活動を続けていたようです。

『陰謀 (クリントン)大統領を葬れ』 大森実 1999 徳間書店 その3

当時はITバブル華やかなりしころであって、経済は順調、ソ連は崩壊して米国1強時代。次の大統領選挙で共和党側が勝つには、民主党政権を貶める必要があったわけですが、多分、コレくらいしか責める手立てがなかったんだろう…と私は思っていたわけです。あくまで私見ですが。タバコ問題があったかどうかはわかりませんが、タバコ産業と広告の関係を描いた『サンキュー・スモーキング』なんて映画もありましたね。あれは面白かった。



閑話休題

ヒラリーのメール問題を見ると、どうしてもモニカ事件が思い起こされます。ヒラリーにはそれ以外にもいろいろ疑惑はあるけど、理解するのは難しいし、さすがに法律の専門家であるだけに、違法にならないようにしているでしょうしね。メール問題は簡単でわかりやすい。

なお、コミー氏はブッシュ(息子)時代の司法副長官だそうです。またか・・・。陰謀があったとはいいませんが、どうなんでしょうね、これ。司法副長官ともなれば、政治任用だろうし。(米国の役人には、資格任用のほかに政治任用という制度があり、政権交代のたびに人が変わります。もちろん残留する人もいるけど)

FBI新長官にコミー元司法省幹部を起用か、オバマ大統領


ヒラリーもさすがにFBI長官の行動については怒っているようです。

クリントン氏、FBI長官に“恨み節” メール問題蒸し返し「私たちの勢い止めた」

Clinton Blames FBI Director for Presidential Election Loss

青山繁晴氏も、実はFBIはトランプ氏をロシアが支援しているという証拠を持っていたが、公表を拒否していたらしいと言っています。(1時間54分ごろ) 


それにしてもメール問題くらいで支持率が落ちてしまうヒラリーは、手嶋龍一氏や青山氏が言うように、選挙に弱すぎるとは言えそう。マッチョなアメリカで、女性がトップに立つには、頭が切れ、経験が豊富だという以外に、どんな素養が必要なんでしょう?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

November 12, 2016

トランプ大統領誕生への雑感

あんまり熱心に追っていなかった今回の米大統領選ですが、ドナルド・トランプが勝利して、次期大統領になるそうですよ。なんというか、反応しようがなくて、何も書くことがない。


NYTの選挙結果

Result


ヒラリー支持というわけではありませんが、トランプとヒラリーなら、ヒラリーでしょう?っていう気持ちはありました。ただ、最も大統領にふさわしいといわれたアル・ゴアがつまらないという理由で(だけじゃないとは思うけど)、ブッシュを選んだアメリカ。教条的なヒラリーに嫌気が差しかねないと懸念してたんです。投票日前日、マスコミは「ヒラリー優勢」と打っており、まあ大丈夫なのかしらと安心していたのですが。この辺、きっとみんなそうなんだろうな。


Cwzpsisucaafu5y_3

ただ日本時間9日午前9時少し過ぎに最初の開票速報が出た時、当然、最初はいつも民主党や共和党のどちらかが勝つ無風州ではあったのですが、あっさり、トランプが共和党州を取ったので、「トランプ優勢かも」と思っておりました。なかなか勝敗が出ないくらいじゃないと、ヒラリーが勝てそうにない、勝利の風が吹かないだろうと。


だんだん開票が進むにつれて、諦めに似た気持ちになっていきました。まあトランプさんの顔が真顔になっていくのが面白かったくらいでしょうか。


否が応でも、世界の大転換期に身を置いているんだなと実感しています。中国の横暴、ロシアの強攻、ISの暴乱という近年の情勢の中で、2016年はマイナス金利、ブレグジット、将来的な譲位の意向と、驚くべき事件が続き、そして最後に(かどうかはわからないけど)、トランプ大統領誕生ですよ。全くなんて年だ。


でも、ガラガラと今まで知っていた世の中が崩れていく様は、東日本大震災で経験した&しているわけで、世界もガラガラと変わっていくのは当然のことかもしれません。


ということで、ガッカリしている人が多いわけですが、まずはオノ・ヨーコさん。叫んでます。

Yokoono



マイケル・ムーアが投稿した「選挙に負けた今やるべき5つのこと」、16万人以上がシェア
過半数のアメリカ人は、ヒラリーの方が良かったんだ。トランプじゃない。彼が大統領になった、ただ一つの理由は、18世紀に作られた、難解でおかしな「選挙人団」と呼ばれるシステムだ。これを変えない限り、自分が選んでない、望んでもいない奴が大統領になる。

まあそうなんですが、選挙は制度で決まるのはどこでも同じですわ。

我々は、多数が“リベラル”な考えを支持する国に住んでいる。ただ、それを実現させるリベラルなリーダーがいないのだ。

といって、ツイッターの中の誰かが期待していたジョージ・クルーニーじゃあないと思うんですよね〜。クルーニーは4年後に向けてアップしてるかもしれないけど。(だって米国大統領は戦争できないとダメですから)

なお、マイケル・ムーアは7月にもう、トランプ勝利を予想していたようです。

ドナルド・トランプが大統領になる5つの理由を教えよう


さて、日本人の方々もいろいろ述べておられ…(あ、オノ・ヨーコさんも日本人ですね)

トランプ大統領誕生の失意をどう受け止めるか|アメリカ大統領選、やじうま観戦記!|渡辺由佳里|cakes(ケイクス)

これがアメリカの真の姿だった 「分断」を選び、衰退の道へ 

わたしたちに見えなかったヒラリーの敗北【NYで生きていく】


トランプの勝因はいろいろ分析されていますが、民主党政権では税金などが上がり、移民に優しいことで雇用が奪われることなどのほかに、ポリティカル・コレクトネスが求められる時代の息苦しさがあるような気がします。クリントがこんなふうに言っているように。

クリント・イーストウッドがトランプ氏支持 「軟弱な時代だ。誰もが発言に細心の注意を払う」

先程、ヒラリーを教条的、と書いたのは、このことを差しております。そして、クリントはトランプ大統領誕生に「ありがとうアメリカ! 私はもう長くは生きられないが、残された数年は素晴らしい時になるだろう」と歓喜のツイートを書き込んだそうです。

・・・・・・・・・・素晴らしい時になるといいんですが。


とりあえず、雑感でした。

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

October 25, 2016

トランプ大勝利…でもなかった:晩餐会

(注)晩餐会の演説、通しで全訳付きで見てみた結果、表題を変更し、書き直しています。

第3回目大統領候補討論会の翌10月21日、NYで開かれたアルフレッド・E・スミスチャリティー晩餐会で、大統領候補同士のジョーク対決があった模様です。前日の討論会はラスベガスですから、およそ5時間くらいかかるNYで、翌日に晩餐会なんて、大変ですね! しかも今度はジョークですよ?  しかも自虐的なw(トランプが自虐的?)

ハフィントンさんが訳してくれてます! Thanks!

クリントン氏、チャリティ晩餐会で自虐スピーチ「史上最年少の女性大統領になる」(全文)
http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/2016/10/24/clinton-speech_n_12630006.html?utm_hp_ref=japan
トランプ氏、いつもと違う? チャリティ晩餐会で自虐スピーチ(全文)
http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/2016/10/23/trump-speech_n_12614300.html?utm_hp_ref=japan

ハフィントンの全文付きで、ビデオを見てみると、ヒラリーもとても頑張ってますね! トランプはドッカンドッカン笑いを取っていたものの、ヒラリーを執拗に攻撃する場面が笑えずブーイングが起きていました。ヒラリーは全体的に上品でした。健康問題のところは良かった。ジョーク対決の勝負結果としては五分五分というところでしょうか。

トランプがとても良かったのは、「ミシェル・オバマが演説して、みな感動した話と全く同じ話を私の妻はしたのに、みな非難するんだ」(表現は違うと思いますが、そんな感じの意味)と、パクリを笑い飛ばした部分。奥様も少し肩の荷が降りたのではないかしら。ここはさすが、エンターテイナー。脱帽です。


Hillary Clinton roasts Donald Trump: The best jokes from presidential candidate's Alfred E Smith speech
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-roast-hillary-clinton-best-jokes-alfred-e-smith-dinner-speech-quotes-a7374121.html


それにしてもみんなひな壇にならんで同じ方向向いてるんでなんだこれ?って思ったんですけど、どうも観客というか一般席のディナーテーブルが手前にあるようです。

ニューヨーク・タイムズの記事も見つけたので貼っておきます。
NYT Donald Trump Heckled by New York Elite at Charity Dinner
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/us/politics/al-smith-dinner-clinton-trump.html?_r=0

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

October 24, 2016

遅くなりましたが…第3回大統領候補討論会


10月20日に開催された第3回大統領候補討論会。前回の第2回からの変化といえば、ロッカールーム話だけのはずだったドナルド・トランプが、実際に女性に性的いやがらせ(この表現、イヤですねえ)をしていたという案件が次から次へと出てきたことでしょう。ま、ヒラリーの選挙事務所のメールが公開されたというのもありました。

で、テレビ討論会なのですが、先日ご紹介したNHKのまとめがよくできているのでそちらに任せます!
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/special/2016-presidential-election/debate8.html

リアルタイムで見ていたものの、体調不良で寝込んでいたので、途中寝てしまう始末。あまりおもしろくなく、また罵り合ってるなあという感想でございました。

唯一面白かったのは、第2回以降、次々と暴露される不祥事で劣勢に立たされつつあるトランプが、「選挙は操作されている」から選挙結果を受け入れないと言い始めたこと。当然、討論会の冒頭で、「選挙結果を認めないのか」という質問がw

ヒラリーは論旨が通るけどいまいち面白くない話を、トランプは支離滅裂な話をしていて、しかしこれも3回目なのでアキてきた感ありまして…。真面目に語る気にもならない。

個人的に面白かったニュースはこちら

ティム・クック氏、アメリカ副大統領候補だった
http://www.gizmodo.jp/2016/10/apple-ceo-john-podesta-wikileaks.html

マイケル・ムーア、ドナルド・トランプを題材にした映画を秘密裏に製作
http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/2016/10/18/michael-moore_n_12548736.html

ヒラリーの白いスーツはラルフ・ローレン製

Hillary Clinton Wore a White Ralph Lauren Suit at the Final Presidential Debate
http://www.allure.com/story/hillary-clinton-ralph-lauren-suit

選挙結果は勝ったら受け入れるそうですw。オイ!

CNN トランプ氏、選挙結果「勝ったら受け入れる」
http://www.cnn.co.jp/usa/35090906.html

投票日は11月8日。間近に迫る今、ヒラリーの勝ちが決まったのかと思ったら、こんなニュースが。

Newsweekトランプ支持率がまさかの再上昇、クリントンに4ポイント差に詰める(ロイター調査・21日)
http://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2016/10/4-19.php

Clinton Vs. Trump: IBD/TIPP Presidential Election Tracking Poll
http://www.investors.com/politics/ibd-tipp-presidential-election-poll/

マジですか!
大統領選にはオクトーバーサプライズがつきものなんだそうですが、「この支持率が驚きじゃ、ボケ!」と言いたくなりますねw。それにしてもヒラリー嫌われてるわ〜。

心の平安のために→ABCはこんな感じです。

AFP 【図解】米大統領選:有権者の支持率の推移(ABC調査・23日)
ヒラリー12ポイントリード
http://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3105485

CNN 期日前投票に330万人超、前回より民主有利か 米大統領選
http://www.cnn.co.jp/usa/35090946.html

民主党有利…だといいですねw
いや、別にヒラリーが好きなわけじゃありませんが…しっかしトランプさんになると、大変だろうなあ…。

| | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

«ダメ出しされましたが・・・